Biotech Executives Express Concern Over Immigration Order

Article

A total of 166 biotech executives penned an open letter expressing concern over President Donald Trump’s executive order on immigration.

On Feb. 7, 2017, 166 biotech executives signed an open letter expressing concern over President Trump’s executive order banning immigration to the United States for 90 days from seven Muslim-majority nations. The letter published in Nature Biotechnology was signed by executives from biotechnology companies across the US. The signatories said they were opposed to the order because it “has compromised years of investment” in the US biopharmaceutical industry.

The biopharma industry draws employees from across the world and is largely dominated by American companies, the letter noted. A talented staff is a biopharma company’s “most precious resource” they continued, and companies in the US employ “tenfold” more people than their European counterparts. The executives also cited a Nature study, which found that approximately 52% of the 69,000 biomedical researchers in the US in 2014 were foreign-born.

Although the Trump administration’s executive order specifically targeted immigration from Iran, Iraq, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, Syria, and Yemen, the signatories indicate the order sends a message that “America is no longer welcoming of any immigrants whatsoever.” Many employees fear religious discrimination, they said, others expressed fear of deportation. The executives called President Trump’s policy “misguided” and said if the policy is not reversed, “America is at risk of losing its leadership position in one of its most important sectors.”

For now, however, the future of the policy is unclear. On Feb. 2, 2017, a district court in Seattle, Washington issued a temporary restraining order suspending the implementation of the executive order. In response, the Trump administration appealed the decision to the US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. A three-judge panel from the Ninth Circuit Court issued a decision on Feb. 9, 2017 upholding the lower court’s ruling, and continuing the suspension. President Trump has spoken out against the ruling and it is likely the case will be appealed to the Supreme Court.

Source: Nature Biotechnology, US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, The White House 

Recent Videos
Miguel Forte from ISCT and Kiji Therapeutics talks about the potential impact of a changing European political landscape.
Miguel Forte from ISCT and Kiji Therapeutics provides his insights into the changing political landscape in the US as well as legislative and regulatory adjustments
Miguel Forte from ISCT and Kiji Therapeutics chats about expectations for 2025 and the future technology agenda for industry.
Sheryl Johnson from Orbia Fluor & Energy Materials chats about gender diversity, how women are helping to advance innovation, sustainability challenges, and progress in the field of inhaled drugs.
Mike Baird from Schlafender Hase gives his predictions for how AI and ML may find use in the industry moving forwards and provides some predictions about M&A and the changing US government administration.
Mike Baird from Schlafender Haser discusses industry trends from 2024 and those expected to have an impact in 2025 from the perspective of a software developer.
Preeya Beczek from Beczek.COM gives her thoughts on the areas to watch with the new US administration and how Europe might be finalizing preparations for previous legislative changes
Related Content