Sampling and Testing Nomenclature for Pharmaceutical Analysis: A Review of Current Practices

News
Article
Pharmaceutical TechnologyPharmaceutical Technology, Regulatory Sourcebook, September 2021
Volume 2021 eBook
Issue 3
Pages: 23–33

Inconsistent sampling and testing processes can lead to errors, resulting in data integrity issues and potentially incorrect decisions about pharmaceutical quality.

Sampling and Testing Nomenclature for Pharmaceutical Analysis: A Review of Current Practices.Image: ipopba - Stock.adobe.com

ipopba - Stock.adobe.com

In pharma applications, consistent sampling and testing nomenclature is critical for data integrity and compliance with specifications and regulatory standards. Inconsistent sampling and testing processes can lead to errors, resulting in data integrity issues and potentially incorrect decisions about pharmaceutical quality.

Guidance documents within the pharma industry and other regulated sectors, however, offer conflicting information. This review of regulatory and compendial standards reveals the scope of the problem.

This article provides a review of available analytical nomenclature, recommended naming for individual steps, and terms used in the process flows. Part two of this paper proposes a simplified approach for sampling and testing nomenclature.

Read this article in Pharmaceutical Technology’s September 2021 Regulatory Sourcebook eBook.

About the author

Chris Burgess is managing director, Burgess Analytical Consultancy Limited, Barnard Castle, Co Durham, UK.

Article Details

Pharmaceutical Technology
eBook: Regulatory Sourcebook
September 2021
Pages: 23–33

Citation

When referring to this article, please cite it as C. Burgess, “Sampling and Testing Nomenclature for Pharmaceutical Analysis: A Review of Current Practices," Pharmaceutical Technology Regulatory Sourcebook eBook (September 2021).

Recent Videos
Drug Digest: Strategic Partnerships
Roger Viney from ICE Pharma discusses the quality and compliance issues surrounding the use of animal-derived ingredients in the bio/pharma industry.
Miguel Forte from ISCT and Kiji Therapeutics provides his insights into the changing political landscape in the US as well as legislative and regulatory adjustments
Mike Baird from Schlafender Hase gives his predictions for how AI and ML may find use in the industry moving forwards and provides some predictions about M&A and the changing US government administration.
Preeya Beczek from Beczek.COM gives her thoughts on the areas to watch with the new US administration and how Europe might be finalizing preparations for previous legislative changes
Drug Digest: Challenges and Triumphs in Next-Generation Biotherapeutic Development