While Catalent’s acquisition is definitely about making drugs, it’s also very much about making money.
High Angle Shot of a Working Desk of an Successful Person in Office with Cityscape Window View. | Image credit: © Gorodenkoff - stock.adobe.com
Novo Holdings’ acquisition of Catalent, in retrospect, was entirely logical (1). We are tempted to see echoes of Thermo Fisher’s buyout of Patheon, or Lonza’s swallowing of capsule maker Capsugel. But this situation is different. Catalent makes significant production of Novo’s Ozempic and Wegovy, but also Lilly’s Mounjaro and Zepbound. And while Catalent’s acquisition is definitely about making drugs, it’s also very much about making money.
Making money takes various forms—taking away a competitor’s capacity to do so is doubtless one of the more intriguing variants. David Ricks, Lilly’s chief executive, was quoted as saying, “the reality is there just isn’t built capacity that’s available. These are technically complex facilities, there’s not an infinite number of people who know how to set them up. And the supply chain for the machines that make the products is also constrained” (2).
An interesting ironic side note is that Catalent has had a checkered compliance past. FDA visited the company’s Brussels plant in October 2021 and August 2022. Reuters reported that “inspectors said the lapses at the plant … represented the most serious form of violations, according to the reports, which show Catalent shut the facility down twice between the two inspections” (3). Reuters goes on to say, “at a meeting with Novo executives in May, two investors out of a group of about five expressed concerns about the choice of Catalent as manufacturing partner, citing the contractor’s history of compliance issues with FDA, according to one of the shareholders who was present. The investor, who declined to be named due to the sensitivity of the matter, said Novo’s Chief Financial Officer Karsten Munk Knudsen had responded by saying that, in hindsight, the company may have made a mistake in choosing Catalent and was now tightly overseeing the firm’s filling operations of Wegovy in Brussels” (3).
Novo Nordisk and Eli Lilly are spending heavily to boost their manufacturing capacity. “That could help them fend off competition from specialized pharmacies that are making generic versions of semaglutide and tirzepatide, an option created by the FDA designating the drugs in shortage” (2). Nevertheless, Anat Ashkenazi, Lilly’s chief financial officer, said in the Post article, “we intend on holding Catalent accountable to their contract with us” (2). Given new ownership, its uncertain if Lilly will be first in line, on the production line.
Mike Hennessy Jr. is the President and CEO of MJH Life Sciences®.
Pharmaceutical Technology®
Vol. 48, No. 3
March 2024
Page: 10
When referring to this article, please cite it as Hennessy, M. First in Line on Catalent’s Line. Pharmaceutical Technology, 2024, 48 (3) 10.
Drug Solutions Podcast: A Closer Look at mRNA in Oncology and Vaccines
April 30th 2024In this episode fo the Drug Solutions Podcast, etherna’s vice-president of Technology and Innovation, Stefaan De Koker, discusses the merits and challenges of using mRNA as the foundation for therapeutics in oncology as well as for vaccines.
Drug Solutions Podcast: Gliding Through the Ins and Outs of the Pharma Supply Chain
November 14th 2023In this episode of the Drug Solutions podcast, Jill Murphy, former editor, speaks with Bourji Mourad, partnership director at ThermoSafe, about the supply chain in the pharmaceutical industry, specifically related to packaging, pharma air freight, and the pressure on suppliers with post-COVID-19 changes on delivery.