Compliance and competitiveness are key factors in aseptic processing, says Siegfried Schmitt, PhD, vice president, Technical at Parexel.
Question mark background | Image Credit: © Leigh-Prather - © Leigh Prather - stock.adobe.com
Q: There appear to be a lot of recent changes in the requirements for aseptic processing. Are there any other key developments in this field we should expect in 2025?
A: The two issues that will most likely be top of the list are compliance and competitiveness. Regarding compliance, although Annex 1, the European Union’s guide to the manufacture of sterile products (1), has been in force for over a year, many companies are still somewhat unsure as to how to comply with certain aspects of this document. In particular, establishing the contamination control strategy (CCS) proves to be more complex and resource intensive than many expected (2,3). Creating this document requires access to many disparate sources of information from several departments. Unless this information is accessible electronically, the task will be made excessively difficult.
When it comes to competitiveness, increasing demands from regulatory bodies, including those governing environment and health, place a burden on industry to find solutions (e.g., minimize waste even when using single-use equipment) that do not compromise compliance.
A good source to keep abreast of developing trends is to look at events and activities organized by leading industry associations that traditionally cover aseptic processing; for example, the International Society for Pharmaceutical Engineering (4,5) or the Parenteral Drug Association (6).
These and other organizations (7) are also providing fora for interested parties that prepare guidance documents (e.g., technical reports, good practice guides, points to consider, or similar) from industry experts for industry peers. Active participation in such groups provides early access to these highly valuable documents.
An area of special interest is to bring manufacturing as close as possible to the points of need or care. Rather than shipping product from a central manufacturing hub to a large number of locations, the idea is to establish more manufacturing sites, or even mobile manufacturing units (8) that will bring a lot more flexibility to manufacturing schedules, and deliver resilience to interrupting factors like environmental disasters or new trade barriers. Aseptic processing validation under these circumstances may need careful consideration.
Siegfried Schmitt, PhD, is vice president, Technical at Parexel.
Pharmaceutical Technology®
Vol. 49, No. 2
March 2025
Page: 34
When referring to this article, please cite it as Schmitt, S. Developments in Aseptic Processing. Pharmaceutical Technology 2025 49 (2).
In Wake of Trump Tariffs, Lilly Plans New US Pharmaceutical Manufacturing Sites
February 26th 2025Previous domestic capital expansion commitments since 2020 had been made in Research Triangle Park and Concord, both in North Carolina; Kenosha County, Wisconsin; Lebanon, Indiana; and Lilly’s home city of Indianapolis.
FDA Approves First Treatment for Rare Lipid Storage Disease Cerebrotendinous Xanthomatosis
February 24th 2025Cerebrotendinous xanthomatosis, or CTX, is a metabolic disorder caused by a gene mutation that results in a deficiency of an important enzyme in the ability of the human body to break down fats.