News|Articles|January 2, 2018

Pharmaceutical Technology

  • Pharmaceutical Technology-01-02-2018
  • Volume 42
  • Issue 1

Removing Subjectivity from the Assessment of Critical Process Parameters and Their Impact

Author(s)Ke Wang, Fangfang Liu, Fasheng Li

A new algorithm uses a statistical approach to critical process parameter assessment, allowing for faster, more consistent, and less subjective critical process parameter quantification, visualization, and documentation.

Determining critical process parameters (CPPs) is vital to defining the control strategy for drug substance and drug product manufacturing processes (1). Deciding the criticality of a process parameter, however, can often become a subjective exercise, resulting in long discussions within product development teams as well as back-and-forth communication with government regulators during new drug application review. 

A data-driven statistical approach was developed (2) to help reduce subjectivity and debate in determining the criticality of process parameters in the manufacturing of drug substance and drug product. The approach uses the distance of a critical quality attribute (CQA) from its quality limit, together with the estimated parameter effect size, to designate the criticality of a process parameter. 

The method relies on straightforward calculations. However, performing these calculations manually can be time-consuming and error-prone when the statistical model involves multi-factor interactions and higher order parameter effects. To incorporate this systematic approach into daily practice, statisticians have developed a web-based computational tool that uses this method.

This article examines how the algorithm was developed, focusing on the calculation of process parameter effect size on a CQA. It also discusses how analytical and numerical solutions of parameter effect size resulted from conventional linear models. 

Click here to view a PDF of this article.

Peer-Reviewed

Submitted: July 31, 2017.
Accepted: August 11, 2017

About the Authors

Fasheng Li, PhD, is director; Brad Evans, PhD, is associate director; Fangfang Liu, PhD, is manager; Jingnan Zhang, PhD, is manager; Ke Wang*, PhD ([email protected]), is director, and Aili Cheng, PhD, is director, all within Pfizer’s department of pharmaceutical science and manufacturing statistics. Ms. Wang can be reached at 860-686-2888.

*To whom correspondence should be addressed.

Article Details

Pharmaceutical Technology
Vol. 42, No. 1
January 2018
Page: 46-54

Citation

When referring to this article, please cite it as F. Li et al., "Removing Subjectivity from the Assessment of Critical Process Parameters and Their Impact," Pharmaceutical Technology 42 (1) 2018.


Related to this article

Intravenous therapy; drip chamber in focus against a colorful background | Image Credit: ©Anna Jurkovska -stock.adobe.com
This article explores the historical use of silicone oil in the performance of primary drug product packaging; design of experiment test results for selection of the cleaning agent and CCPs; assessment of visible residue limits and Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy surface analysis; and setting health-based exposure limits for silicone oil using a non-uniform distribution model, and a previously published permitted daily exposure.
Ask the Expert: Post-Approval Changes
In this episode of Ask the Expert, Siegfried Schmitt, PhD, vice president, Technical at Parexel, and Susan J. Schniepp, distinguished fellow at Nelson Labs, discuss how companies should approach post-approval changes to their CMC regulatory filings.