Regulations Causing Innovation Failure, Impact Pfizer

Article

According to the UK's Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC), the closure of Pfizer's UK R&D facility, announced last week, is part of a long-term decline in drug development that is affecting all major UK pharmaceutical multinationals.

According to the UK’s Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC), the closure of Pfizer’s UK research and development (R&D) facility, announced last week, is part of a long-term decline in drug development that is affecting all major UK pharmaceutical multinationals. The ESRC blames the decline on “failure of innovative drive in the industry, failure of the UK to support basic research, failure of venture capital to invest in early-stage research, or failure of the Health Service to provide smart procurement.”

In particular, the stunted innovation has been attributed to the “lengthy and expensive regulatory system,” according to an ESRC press statement. Although regulation impacts all products developed by any industry sector, it is significantly felt in the pharma industry, where it affects overall company strategies, which companies succeed and fail, and, ultimately, the entire structure and dynamism of the sector as a whole.

According to research by the ESRC’s Innogen Center, the pharmaceutical industry is approaching a “tipping point” in the not-too-distant future in which innovation will no longer be sustainable. However, “radical reform” of regulatory systems could help to better ensure a productive and profitable pharma sector—both globally and in the UK.

“We do not need less regulation, but smarter regulation that can deliver expected standards of safety and efficacy, and that is flexible enough to respond to new scientific discoveries and do so more efficiently than our current systems within a shorter timeframe,” Professor Joyce Tait, director of the ESRC's Innogen Center, said in the statement.

ESRC believes that radical regulatory reform for the life-sciences industries should be a priority in discussions regarding the industry’s future. “Reform could provide the lever to profitably unleash the creativity that has been so effectively generated from public funding of basic science, leading to something closer to the innovative performance that we have seen in information and communication technologies over the past 20 years,” said the ESRC in the press statement.

See a related blog post on PharmTech Talk, titled, Pfizer Site Closure “Shocking Wake-Up Call” for UK

Recent Videos
Ian Lafferty from Upperton discusses the trends and challenges facing sterile manufacturing and how partnering with CDMOs can help innovators progress to the market.
Miguel Forte from ISCT and Kiji Therapeutics talks about the potential impact of a changing European political landscape.
Miguel Forte from ISCT and Kiji Therapeutics provides his insights into the changing political landscape in the US as well as legislative and regulatory adjustments
Miguel Forte from ISCT and Kiji Therapeutics chats about expectations for 2025 and the future technology agenda for industry.
Sheryl Johnson from Orbia Fluor & Energy Materials chats about gender diversity, how women are helping to advance innovation, sustainability challenges, and progress in the field of inhaled drugs.
Mike Baird from Schlafender Hase gives his predictions for how AI and ML may find use in the industry moving forwards and provides some predictions about M&A and the changing US government administration.
Mike Baird from Schlafender Haser discusses industry trends from 2024 and those expected to have an impact in 2025 from the perspective of a software developer.
Preeya Beczek from Beczek.COM gives her thoughts on the areas to watch with the new US administration and how Europe might be finalizing preparations for previous legislative changes