FDA Issues Guidance on Bioequivalence Studies

News
Article

FDA issued a new guidance for industry concerning the submission of summary bioequivalence data for abbreviated new drug applications.

This month, FDA issued a new guidance for industry concerning the submission of summary bioequivalence data for abbreviated new drug applications (ANDAs). The guidance is meant to clarify the requirements for the submission of bioequivalence data that were published in 2009 (1). Federal regulations require that all bioequivalence studies performed for a given agent be submitted as part of the ANDA, regardless of whether the study confirms that the product is equivalent to the reference listed drug (RLD).

FDA believes that review of both positive and negative data may be “important in our determination of whether a product is bioequivalent to the RLD and are relevant to our evaluation of generic products in general,” according to the guidance. “These data will increase our understanding of generic drug development and how changes in components and composition may affect formulation performance, as well as promote further development of science-based bioequivalence policies,” says the guidance.

The guidance consists of two sections. The first section clarifies what types of ANDAs must include all bioequivalence studies and specifies the necessary format for a summary report. The second section clarifies what the meaning of “the same product formulation” for immediate-release drug forms, extended-release drug products, semisolid dosage forms, and other complex dosage forms. This section also contains examples of slightly different formulations that would be considered the same product, and of other formulations that would be considered different.

Reference

1. FDA, “Requirements for Submission of Bioequivalence Data; Final Rule.” Fed. Regist.74(11), 2849–2862 (Jan. 16, 2009).

Recent Videos
Ian Lafferty from Upperton discusses the trends and challenges facing sterile manufacturing and how partnering with CDMOs can help innovators progress to the market.
Miguel Forte from ISCT and Kiji Therapeutics talks about the potential impact of a changing European political landscape.
Miguel Forte from ISCT and Kiji Therapeutics provides his insights into the changing political landscape in the US as well as legislative and regulatory adjustments
Miguel Forte from ISCT and Kiji Therapeutics chats about expectations for 2025 and the future technology agenda for industry.
Sheryl Johnson from Orbia Fluor & Energy Materials chats about gender diversity, how women are helping to advance innovation, sustainability challenges, and progress in the field of inhaled drugs.
Mike Baird from Schlafender Hase gives his predictions for how AI and ML may find use in the industry moving forwards and provides some predictions about M&A and the changing US government administration.
Mike Baird from Schlafender Haser discusses industry trends from 2024 and those expected to have an impact in 2025 from the perspective of a software developer.
Preeya Beczek from Beczek.COM gives her thoughts on the areas to watch with the new US administration and how Europe might be finalizing preparations for previous legislative changes