Draft Annex to ICH Q8 Clarifies Key Concepts

Article

ePT--the Electronic Newsletter of Pharmaceutical Technology

The US Food and Drug Administration published a draft annex to its ICH Q8 Pharmaceutical Development guidance that clarifies that document?s key concepts.

Rockville, MD (Jan. 10)-The US Food and Drug Administration published a draft annex to its ICH Q8 Pharmaceutical Development guidance that clarifies the document’s key concepts. The draft guidance is titled ICH Q8 (R1) Pharmaceutical Development Revision 1.

The new annex describes the principles of quality by design (QbD) and explains how manufacturers can implement concepts listed in ICH Q8 (e.g., design space) for all dosage forms. The guidance states that applying QbD and quality risk management creates opportunities “to enhance science- and risk-based regulatory approaches.”

In the draft document, FDA encourages manufacturers to adopt a systematic method for understanding their products and manufacturing processes. Such a strategy “can create a basis for more flexible regulatory approaches,” according the annex.

One major section of the annex examines the elements that should be included in pharmaceutical development. The section suggests systematic ways for manufacturers to gain a thorough understanding of the products and processes they develop. It lists the purposes and advantages of tools such as target product profiles, critical quality attributes, risk assessment, design space, control strategy, and life cycle management.

A subsequent section of the annex offers advice about submitting pharmaceutical development information in a common technical document format. The annex states that data derived from tools that are part of the applicant’s pharmaceutical quality system (e.g., product life cycle management and continual improvement) do not need to be submitted in a registration application. The draft guidance says “the degree of regulatory flexibility is predicated on the level of relevant scientific knowledge provided in the registration application.”

For the full text of the draft guidance, click here.

Recent Videos
Miguel Forte from ISCT and Kiji Therapeutics provides his insights into the changing political landscape in the US as well as legislative and regulatory adjustments
Miguel Forte from ISCT and Kiji Therapeutics chats about expectations for 2025 and the future technology agenda for industry.
Sheryl Johnson from Orbia Fluor & Energy Materials chats about gender diversity, how women are helping to advance innovation, sustainability challenges, and progress in the field of inhaled drugs.
Mike Baird from Schlafender Hase gives his predictions for how AI and ML may find use in the industry moving forwards and provides some predictions about M&A and the changing US government administration.
Mike Baird from Schlafender Haser discusses industry trends from 2024 and those expected to have an impact in 2025 from the perspective of a software developer.
Preeya Beczek from Beczek.COM gives her thoughts on the areas to watch with the new US administration and how Europe might be finalizing preparations for previous legislative changes